The victim has won in 36 of these 54 cases. These decisions are non-binding, so the Committee is often forced to follow up over a long period of time to attempt to get the state's compliance to its ruling. The government is usually given 3 to 6 months to submit an initial written response, confirming that it has implemented the decision.
This number of cases so far in 2012 probably represents about 50% of the total number of decisions that will eventually be issued during the full year.
The UN is still struggling to release these decisions in a timely and transparent manner. Efforts this year to establish linked pages to each of the main treaty body sites where a table of decisions is listed is a welcome development, but the accuracy of the information on these sites is still uneven. Some decisions which can be found in the treaty body database are not included in these new tables, and other decisions are found in the new tables but not in the database. Also the numbers of decisions issued each session often do not correspond to the numbers announced by the treaty body itself for that session. The issuance of the decision often trails the date of adoption by 3 to 6 months, sometimes longer.
Here is a listing of the decisions released so far that I am aware of. I will add case summaries of these decisions in a later post.
No.
|
Treaty
|
Case no.
|
Parties
|
Result
|
Session
|
1
|
CERD
|
46/2009
|
Dawas & Shava v.
Denmark
|
Violation
|
Feb 2012
|
2
|
CRPD
|
3/2011
|
H.M. v. Sweden
|
Violations
|
Feb 2012
|
3
|
CEDAW
|
19/2008
|
Kell v. Canada
|
Violations
|
Feb 2012
|
4
|
CEDAW
|
25/2010
|
M.P.M. v. Canada
|
Inadmissible
|
Feb 2012
|
5
|
CEDAW
|
38/2010
|
R.K.B. v. Turkey
|
Violations
|
Feb 2012
|
6
|
CEDAW
|
Jallow v. Bulgaria
|
Violations
|
July 2012
|
|
7
|
CAT
|
343/2008
|
Kalonzo v. Canada
|
Violations
|
May 2012
|
8
|
CAT
|
364/2008
|
J.L.L. et al v.
Switzerland
|
No violation
|
May 2012
|
9
|
CAT
|
370/2009
|
E.L. v. Canada
|
No violation
|
May 2012
|
10
|
CAT
|
382/2009
|
M.D.T. v. Switzerland
|
No violation
|
May 2012
|
11
|
CAT
|
391/2009
|
M.A.M.A. v. Switzerland
|
Violations
|
May 2012
|
12
|
CAT
|
393/2009
|
E.T. v. Switzerland
|
No violation
|
May 2012
|
13
|
CAT
|
396/2009
|
Gbadjari v. Switzerland
|
Violations
|
May 2012
|
14
|
CAT
|
413/2010
|
A.A.M. v. Sweden
|
No violation
|
May 2012
|
15
|
CAT
|
414/2010
|
N.T.W. v. Switzerland
|
No violation
|
May 2012
|
16
|
CAT
|
424/2010
|
M.Z.A. v. Sweden
|
No violation
|
May 2012
|
17
|
CAT
|
433/2010
|
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan
|
Violations
|
May 2012
|
18
|
CAT
|
444/2010
|
Abdussamotov et al v.
Kazakhstan
|
Violations
|
May 2012
Note: this one included
an oral hearing.
|
19
|
CAT
|
453/2011
|
Gallastegi Sodupe v.
Spain
|
Violations
|
May 2012
|
20
|
CCPR
|
1820/2008
|
Krasovky v. Belarus
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
21
|
CCPR
|
1772/2008
|
Belyazeka v. Belarus
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
22
|
CCPR
|
1905/2009
|
Khirani v. Algeria
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
23
|
CCPR
|
1853/2008
|
Atasoy & Sarkut v.
Turkey
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
24
|
CCPR
|
1789/2008
|
G.E. v. Germany
|
Inadmissible
|
March 2012
|
25
|
CCPR
|
1914/15/16/2009
|
Musaev v. Uzbekistan
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
26
|
CCPR
|
1801/2008
|
G.K. v. Netherlands
|
No violation
|
March 2012
|
27
|
CCPR
|
1627/2007
|
V.P. v. Russian Fed’n
|
Inadmissible
|
March 2012
|
28
|
CCPR
|
1829/2008
|
Benitez Gamarra v.
Paraguay
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
29
|
CCPR
|
1828/2008
|
Olmedo v. Paraguay
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
30
|
CCPR
|
1634/2007
|
*Korneenko v Belarus
|
Inadmissible
|
March 2012
|
31
|
CCPR
|
1816/2008
|
K.A.L. & A.A.M.L.
v. Canada
|
Inadmissible
|
March 2012
|
32
|
CCPR
|
2058/2011
|
O.D. v. Russian Fed’n
|
Inadmissible
|
March 2012
|
33
|
CCPR
|
1858/2009
|
Y.M. v. Russian Fed’n
|
Inadmissible
|
March 2012
|
34
|
CCPR
|
1606/2007
|
E.I. v. Belarus
|
Inadmissible
|
March 2012
|
35
|
CCPR
|
1750/2008
|
Sudalenko v. Belarus
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
36
|
CCPR
|
1880/2009
|
Nenova et al. v. Libya
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
37
|
CCPR
|
1859/2008
|
Kamoyo v. Zambia
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
38
|
CCPR
|
1641/2007
|
Calderon Bruges v.
Colombia
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
39
|
CCPR
|
1752/2008
|
J.S. v. New Zealand
|
Inadmissible
|
March 2012
|
40
|
CCPR
|
1755/2008
|
El Hagog v. Libya
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
41
|
CCPR
|
1866/2009
|
Chebotareva v. Russian
Fed’n
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
42
|
CCPR
|
1782/2008
|
Aboufaied v. Libya
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
43
|
CCPR
|
1883/2009
|
Orazova v. Turkmenistan
|
Violations
|
March 2012
|
44
|
CCPR
|
1226/2003
|
*Korneenko v. Belarus
|
Violations
|
July 2012
|
45
|
CCPR
|
1628/2007
|
Pavlyuchenkov v.
Russian Fed’n
|
Violations
|
July 2012
|
46
|
CCPR
|
1303/2004
|
Chiti v. Zambia
|
Violations
|
July 2012
|
47
|
CCPR
|
1827/2008
|
S.V. v. Canada
|
Inadmissible
|
July 2012
|
48
|
CCPR
|
1840/2008
|
X.J. v. Netherlands
|
Inadmissible
|
July 2012
|
49
|
CCPR
|
1790/2008
|
Govsha et.al v. Belarus
|
Violations
|
July 2012
|
50
|
CCPR
|
1753/2008
|
Guezout et.al v.
Algeria
|
Violations
|
July 2012
|
51
|
CCPR
|
1784/2008
|
Schumilin v. Belarus
|
Violations
|
July 2012
|
52
|
CCPR
|
1526/2006
|
V.A. v. Russian Fed’n
|
Inadmissible
|
July 2012
|
53
|
CCPR
|
1558/2007
|
Katsaris v. Greece
|
Violations
|
July 2012
|
54
|
CCPR
|
1863/2009
|
Dev Bahadur Mharjan v.
Nepal
|
Violations
|
July 2012
|
*note that there are 2
separate decisions brought by Viktor Korneenko against Belarus. In 1226/2003
violations were found (CCPR July session). In 1634/2007 the Committee ruled the
claim to be inadmissible (CCPR March session).
No comments:
Post a Comment