None of the countries currently under review by the treaty body system have filed their report on time

One common criticism of the human rights treaty system is the failure of states to file their reports on time. This disrupts the system in several ways, including scheduling, allocation of resources, backlogs and slowdowns in the workflow. 

There are several ways to measure this non-compliance, but one is to take a quick snapshot of the current workload in the treaty body system. Two treaty bodies are currently in session, the Human Rights Committee (July 3-28) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (July 3-21). 

Fifteen (15) countries in total are being reviewed by these two Committees.  None of the fifteen has filed on time.  The average amount of delay in filing the report has been 5.4 years. 

Here are some details. 

CEDAW

Country	Filed on time?	Within page/word limits?	Is there a response to prior Concluding Observations?
Barbados	No, 15 years late	Yes	Yes
Costa Rica	No, 3 months late	Yes	No
Italy	No, 4 months late	Yes	No
Montenegro	No, 9 months late.	Yes	Yes
Niger	No, 3 years late.	Yes	Yes
Nigeria	No, 16 months late.	No, it appears to be 2X the applicable limit	Yes but in an annex only
Romania	No, 6 years late	Yes	n/a LOIPR report
Thailand	No 5 years late	Yes	Apparently not, but hard to tell for sure.

-->

     * note that all reports were late. Average degree of lateness was 5.9 years, but if you remove Barbados from the calculation, the average is 2.3 years.

o   Barbados – combined 5^th through 8^th periodic reports. Due 9/3/99. Submitted 7/20/15. 15 years late.  44 pages. 17,419 words.  Yes, Part One responds to the prior recommendations.

o   Costa Rica – 7^th periodic report. Due 7/1/15. Submitted 9/22/15. 3 months late. 32 pages. 15, 021 words.  There is general reference, but I could not find specific point by point responses to prior recommendations of the Committee.

o   Italy – 7^th periodic report. Due 7/1/15. Submitted 10/27/15. 4 months late. 43 pages. 19,907 words.  I could not find responses to prior recommendations.

o   Montenegro – 2^nd periodic report. Due 10/1/15. Submitted 6/13/16. 9 months late. 42 pages, 19,209 words.  Yes, the report is structured as a response to the prior recommendations.

o   Niger – combined 3^rd & 4^th periodic reports. Due 11/7/12. Submitted 8/13/15. 3 years late. 30 pages, 11,913 words.  Yes, the report highlights prior recommendations and provides responses.

o   Nigeria --  combined 7^th and 8^th periodic reports. Due 7/13/14. Submitted 10/7/15. 16 months late. 65 pages. 52,824 words.  My method of counting words is approximate, but this report certainly seems to be way over the limit of 21,200 words.  According to the introduction to the report, a synopsis of the responses to all of the prior recommendations is contained in Annex 1.  This annex is 12 pages, in table form.  It appears to be comprehensive.  But it does not cross reference to the parts of the main report where these responses are covered; instead it is a point by point reference in addition to the report itself. Very strange.

o   Romania – combined 7^th & 8^th periodic reports.  A LOIPR report. Due 2/1/11. Submitted 2/6/17. 6 years late.  42 pages. 21,044 words.  I could not find any reference to the prior recommendations or any responses to them.  No table of contents either, apparently due to lack of available space under the word limit. Note that this is an LOIPR report, so that is probably why there is no response to prior recommendations.

-->

o   Thailand – combined 6^th & 7^th periodic reports. Due 9/1/10. Submitted 6/18/15. 5 years late.  35 pages, 14, 258 words.  There are references to prior recommendations, but it does not appear complete. However, it is difficult to be sure. No index or table of references.  There are general references like “Thailand has made serious efforts to implement the Committee’s recommendations” but without any details.

Human Rights Committee

-->

Country	On time?	Within word limits?	Response to last COs?
Honduras	No, 5 yrs late	Yes	No
Liechtenstein	No, 6.5 yrs late	Yes	No
Madagascar	No, 4.5 yrs late	Yes	No
Mongolia	No, 1 yr late	Yes	No
Pakistan	No, 4 yrs late	Yes	Not applicable – initial report
Switzerland	No, 1 year late	Yes	Not applicable – LOIPR report
Swaziland	No, 12 yrs overdue	Not applicable – no report	Not applicable – no report

*note that all 7 reports are late or overdue. Average is 4.8 years late.

o   Honduras – 2^nd periodic report. Due 10/31/10. Submitted 10/21/15.  5 years late.  12 annexes also submitted. Also 20 annexes submitted to the reply to the list of issues. 11 NGO reports. 2 NHRI reports.  31 pages. 17,581 words.  There are general references to the prior recommendations, but apparently not a point by point response.

o   Liechtenstein – 2^nd periodic report. Due 8/1/09. Submitted 3/24/16.  6-1/2 years late. 1 NGO report.  36 pages. 20,990 words.  There is general reference to the prior recommendations, but I could not find point by point responses.

o   Madagascar – 4^th periodic report. Due 3/23/11. Submitted 11/09/15. 4-1/2 years late. 6 NGO reports. Report is available in French and Spanish only.  56 pages. Approximately 19,200 words. No apparent reference to prior recommendations, but it is difficult to know for sure since the report is not available in English.

o   Mongolia – 6^th periodic report. Due 4/1/15. Submitted 3/30/16. One year late. 7 NGO reports. 1 NHRI report. 25 pages. 13,194 words. No apparent reference to prior recommendations. No index or table of contents.  No introduction where comments might be found on the prior recommendations.

o   Pakistan – initial report. Due 10/23/11. Submitted 10/19/15. 4 years late. 27 NGO reports.  45 pages. Approximately 24,500 words.  Not applicable re prior recommendations, because this is an initial report.

o   Switzerland – 4^th report. An LOIPR report. Initially due in 2015. Then due 7/1/16 and submitted 7/7/16. One year late. 4 annexes also submitted to the report. 12 NGO reports. 34 pages, 20,500 words.  Responses to prior recommendations not applicable since this is an LOIPR report.

o   Swaziland (reviewed in the absence of a report) – initial report.  Due 6/26/05. 12 years overdue. List of issues was issued in the absence of a report in March 2017. The government submitted a reply to the list of issues on May 15, 2017. 17 pages. 8760 words. 2 NGO reports.